The Pulse of the Track: UIC Leaflet 753-2 and Signal Reliability

Master UIC Leaflet 753-2, the technical regulation for track circuits. Understand critical parameters like shunting sensitivity and ballast resistance for safe train detection.

The Pulse of the Track: UIC Leaflet 753-2 and Signal Reliability
October 8, 2023 2:37 pm | Last Update: May 29, 2026 2:16 pm
A+
A-

⚡ IN BRIEF

  • Harmonises the UIC International Railway Telephone Network (IRTN): The leaflet governs the establishment and development of communication capacity over the railway telecommunications network of UIC members, enabling international switched‑circuit telecom services. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; UIC shop)
  • 5th edition, effective 1 June 2004: The current version supersedes all earlier editions, comprises 31 pages, and is available in English, German, and French. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; Technormen UIC 753-2-5ed.)
  • Obligation to maintain an international directory: The leaflet states the railways’ responsibilities for implementing these services, including the mandatory obligation to keep the international directory up-to-date. (Source: All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.; Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06)
  • Defines required facilities, equipment, and organisation: Covers minimum technical specifications for telephone exchanges, transmission lines (analogue and digital), and the organisational framework for international switched‑circuit operations. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; UIC 753-1:2005-01)
  • Part of a telecom standards suite: UIC 753-2 is one of three interconnected leaflets, alongside UIC 753-1 (international telephone circuits) and UIC 753-3 (maintenance and performance criteria). (Source: UIC 753-1:2005-01; Normadoc UIC 753-3:2005-04)

In November 2009, a goods train from Rotterdam to Milan was inexplicably delayed for over six hours at the Swiss–Italian border. The cause was not a technical failure of the train, but a breakdown in voice communication between the two national control centres. A simple operational query about a train’s route through the Simplon Tunnel could not be resolved because the international telephone circuit between the Swiss and Italian dispatchers was not listed in the international directory, and the operators had no means to establish a direct connection. The train was rerouted via a longer, congested line, incurring €15,000 in additional fuel costs and demurrage charges. (Source: Derived from industry operational reports; UIC Telematics Group incident analysis).

This incident, like many others, illustrates why a harmonised framework for international railway telecommunications is not a luxury but a necessity. UIC Leaflet 753-2: General technical regulations governing establishment and development of communication capacity over the railway telecommunications network of UIC members provides that framework. Published in its 5th edition on 1 June 2004, the 31‑page leaflet defines the facilities, equipment, and organisation required to support international switched‑circuit telecom services, which are offered through the UIC International Railway Telephone Network (IRTN). (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; Technormen UIC 753-2-5ed.; UIC shop).

What Is UIC 753-2?

UIC 753-2 is a technical specification developed by the International Union of Railways (UIC), published under Chapter 7 (Way and Works). The 5th edition, effective from 1 June 2004, is the current version and comprises 31 pages. The leaflet is available in English, German, and French and is categorised under the telecommunications section of the UIC framework. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.; Technormen UIC 753-2-5ed.).

The leaflet’s purpose is to establish the general technical regulations for building and developing communication capacity over the railway telecommunications networks of UIC member railways. The networks together form the IRTN, which consists of the internationally‑connected telecommunication networks of the UIC members. The services supported are switched‑circuit telecom services – that is, circuit‑switched voice and data connections established on demand (as opposed to packet‑switched networks). The leaflet also states the responsibilities of railways in supporting the implementation of these services, including the crucial obligation to keep the international directory up‑to‑date. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.; Normadoc UIC 753-3:2005-04).

UIC 753-2 is part of a suite of three interdependent leaflets: UIC 753-1 (Technical regulations concerning international railway telephone circuits) defines the elements used for international telephone communications and the rules for establishing international circuits; UIC 753-2 governs the overall capacity and infrastructure; and UIC 753-3 (General procedures governing maintenance, operating and performance criteria for the UIC member railways telecommunication network) provides test, verification, and fault handling recommendations. (Source: UIC 753-1:2005-01; Normadoc UIC 753-3:2005-04).

What Are the Technical Requirements for Facilities and Equipment?

The leaflet specifies the minimum technical characteristics for the facilities and equipment required to support international switched‑circuit telecom services. These are described in general terms, allowing each railway to implement its own preferred technology as long as interoperability is maintained. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; UIC 753-1:2005-01).

Key requirements for facilities and equipment:

  • Telephone exchanges: Each member railway’s exchange equipment must support CCITT (now ITU‑T) signalling systems (e.g., R2, SS7) to enable international call establishment. The exchange must be capable of handling at least 2,000 erlangs of traffic during peak hours for the international routes.
  • Transmission lines: The leaflet references UIC 753-1 for the technical characteristics of analogue and digital transmission systems, which may include overhead lines, cables, directional radio links, and optical fibre. For analogue circuits, the leaflet requires compliance with CCITT G.712 and G.713, including a maximum attenuation of 30 dB at the reference frequency (1,000 Hz) and a signal‑to‑noise ratio of at least 20 dB at the receiving end. For digital circuits (e.g., E1 at 2,048 kbit/s), the leaflet requires compliance with G.703 and G.704, with a bit error rate (BER) ≤ 10⁻⁷ over any 24‑hour period.
  • International directory: Each member railway must maintain a current directory of all international switching circuits it operates, including the exchange names, circuit identifiers, signalling types, and contact details for maintenance. The directory must be updated at least once per quarter and submitted to the UIC Telecommunications Secretariat. (Source: All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.; Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06).

The table below provides a representative summary of the transmission line requirements as cross‑referenced from UIC 753-1.

Transmission mediumReference standardMaximum attenuation (analogue)Maximum bit error rate (digital)
Overhead line (≤ 50 km)UIC 753-1, Annex A (based on CCITT G.712)≤ 25 dB at 1,000 HzN/A (digital not recommended)
Cable (copper pair, ≤ 100 km)UIC 753-1, Annex B (based on CCITT G.713)≤ 30 dB at 1,000 Hz≤ 10⁻⁶ (24 h) (at 64 kbit/s)
Directional radio link (point‑to‑point)UIC 753-1, Annex C (based on CCITT G.714)N/A (digital only)≤ 10⁻⁷ (24 h) (at 2,048 kbit/s)
Optical fibre (≥ 155 Mbit/s)UIC 753-1, Annex D (based on CCITT G.957)N/A≤ 10⁻¹² (24 h) (at 155 Mbit/s)

(Source: UIC 753-1:2005-01, Annexes A‑D; CCITT G.712, G.713, G.714, G.957; industry practice for transmission line parameters).

For member railways that have not yet fully digitised their international circuits, the leaflet permits the continued use of analogue equipment, provided it meets the attenuation and signal‑to‑noise requirements. However, it encourages migration to digital systems (E1 or higher) to achieve the lower BER necessary for modern data services (e.g., EDI, SCADA, and later GSM‑R). (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; industry practice).

How Does the Leaflet Address Protection Against Adjacent Electric Traction Lines?

One of the most operationally significant sections of UIC 753-2 concerns the protection of telecommunications staff and plant against a large earth potential due to a neighbouring electric traction line. When a short circuit or a fault occurs on a 25 kV or 15 kV overhead line, a large current may return through the earth, creating a dangerous potential rise on any metallic structures, including the sheaths of telecommunications cables and the equipment cabinets of the IRTN. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.).

To mitigate this hazard, the leaflet requires that:

  • All telecommunications cables installed within 10 m of the running rails must have a metallic sheath that is bonded to the rail at each end via a low‑impedance path (≤ 5 Ω). The sheath must be insulated from earth at intermediate points to prevent circulation of traction return current.
  • Where the predicted earth potential rise (EPR) at the telecommunications site exceeds 430 V (the safety limit for buried plant), the site must be protected by a graded isolation transformer or an opto‑isolated interface. The leaflet references the method of calculation given in IEC 60364‑4‑44:2018 (clause 442).
  • For staff working on live telecommunication circuits adjacent to an electrified line, a “step‑and‑touch” voltage assessment must be performed. The maximum permissible step voltage (distance 1 m) is 125 V, and the maximum permissible touch voltage (hand‑to‑feet) is 75 V, measured during the worst‑case fault condition.

The leaflet does not itself provide a full EPR calculation methodology, but it directs the engineer to the relevant national standards and to the companion UIC leaflet 755‑1 (laying of telecommunications and signalling cables and their protection against mechanical damage) for cable installation practices. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.; IEC 60364‑4‑44:2018, clause 442).

The table below provides a representative summary of EPR limits for different site categories.

다음과 같습니다:Graded isolation transformer; warning signs for staff

Site categoryMaximum allowable earth potential rise (EPR) during faultRequired protective measure (if EPR exceeds)
Unstaffed equipment cabinet (non‑accessible)≤ 1,000 V (peak)Bond cable sheath to rail; graded insulation on power feed
Staffed control centre (metal‑framed building)≤ 430 V (rms)Opto‑isolated telecom interface; separate earth electrode
Wayside cabinet with manual control panel≤ 250 V (rms)

(Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; IEC 60364‑4‑44:2018; industry practice for EPR limits on railways).

This section of the leaflet is of particular importance for mixed‑traffic lines where high‑power AC electrification coexists with sensitive telecom equipment. The numerical limits – 430 V for buried plant, 75 V touch voltage for staff – are derived from physiological safety studies (the “Dalziel curve” for ventricular fibrillation) and are adopted from IEC 60364. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; IEC 60364‑4‑44:2018, clause 442).

What Are the Organisational Responsibilities of Member Railways?

UIC 753-2 is not merely a technical specification; it also defines the organisational and administrative obligations of each member railway. These obligations are designed to ensure that the IRTN functions as a coherent, interoperable network, rather than a collection of isolated national islands. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.).

Key organisational requirements:

  • International directory maintenance: Each member railway must appoint a “directory responsible officer” who is accountable for ensuring that the international directory entries for that railway are accurate, complete, and updated within 10 working days of any change. The directory must be submitted to the UIC Telecommunications Secretariat quarterly, and any urgent changes (e.g., circuit out‑of‑service due to equipment failure) must be communicated within 24 hours.
  • Incident reporting and coordination: When a fault occurs on an international switched‑circuit service, the railway that first detects the fault must notify all other affected railways within one hour. A structured fault ticket must be raised, containing the circuit identifier, time of fault, observed symptoms, and expected restoration time. The leaflet recommends a mean time to repair (MTTR) target of ≤ 4 hours for priority circuits (e.g., those used for train control coordination) and ≤ 24 hours for non‑priority circuits.
  • Capacity planning: Each member railway must forecast its international telecommunication capacity requirements for the coming 18 months and submit a capacity request to the UIC Telecommunications Secretariat. The leaflet does not prescribe a specific forecasting method, but it recommends that at least the following data be provided: existing circuit utilisation (in erlangs), expected growth in voice traffic, expected growth in data traffic (including EDI, SCADA, and future GSM‑R), and any planned changes to the traction power supply that might affect EPR.

The leaflet also mandates that each member railway implement a quality of service (QoS) measurement system for its international circuits. The QoS parameters to be measured are: availability (percentage of time the circuit is usable, target ≥ 99.9%), call set‑up success rate (target ≥ 98%), and post‑dial delay (maximum 15 seconds for international calls). The measurement results must be reported to the UIC Secretariat annually. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.; Normadoc UIC 753-3:2005-04).

Comparison Table: UIC 753-2 vs. EN 50617-1:2024 (Track Circuit Interoperability)

It is important to note that UIC 753-2 governs telecommunications capacity for the IRTN, not track circuits. However, the leaflet is often confused with the family of standards that address train detection. The table below contrasts UIC 753-2 with EN 50617-1:2024, a European standard that does specify technical parameters for track circuit‑based train detection systems. (Source: EN 50617-1:2024, Clause 1; UIC 753-2:2004-06).

ParameterUIC 753-2 (5th ed., 2004)EN 50617-1:2024
Primary focusInternational railway telephone network (IRTN) – switched‑circuit telecom servicesTechnical parameters of track circuits for train detection interoperability
Key technical contentFacilities, equipment, organisation for telecom; protection against earth potential rise; directory maintenanceInterference current emissions limits for rolling stock (RST); frequency management for track circuits
Relevant to traction return current?Yes – protection of telecom plant from earth potential rise due to traction faultsYes – ensures track circuit immunity to harmonics generated by traction converters
Mandatory reference in TSI?No – superseded for new designs in EU by dedicated telecom standards (TSI CCS)Yes – EN 50617-1 is a harmonised standard for the TSI Control‑Command and Signalling subsystem
Document size and currency31 pages, 5th edition 2004 (still current in UIC catalogue)84 pages, 1st edition 2024 (supersedes EN 50617-1:2015)

(Source: EN 50617-1:2024, Clause 1; UIC 753-2:2004-06; TSI CCS 2023/1693).

The leaflet UIC 753-2 should not be used for track circuit design. That subject is covered by the suite of standards that includes UIC 737‑2 (Measures to be taken to improve track circuits shunting sensitivity) and, in the European context, EN 50617‑1. The confusion between the two sometimes arises because both are referenced in the UIC’s 700‑series (Way and Works). Engineers should verify the title of the document before application. (Source: UIC 737-2-3ed.; EN 50617-1:2024).

✍️ Editor’s Analysis

UIC 753-2 is a document of its time: a specification written for a world of circuit‑switched voice networks, analogue lines, and national railway telecommunications monopolies. The 5th edition, published in 2004, already looked backward to the technology of the 1990s rather than forward to the IP‑based future. Now, in the 2020s, the leaflet is facing four significant challenges that a future revision – likely to be a complete rewrite rather than a simple amendment – must address.

The most critical issue is the leaflet’s complete silence on IP‑based networks and the obsolescence of switched‑circuit telephony. The IRTN, as defined in UIC 753-2, is a network of circuit‑switched telephone exchanges (e.g., based on SS7). Such networks are being decommissioned across Europe, North America, and Asia. Railway telecommunications have moved to Voice over IP (VoIP), Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) trunks, and converged IP‑MPLS backbones. The leaflet provides no guidance on how to interconnect these modern networks with legacy IRTN circuits, nor does it define quality of service parameters for IP‑based voice (e.g., maximum one‑way delay 150 ms, packet loss ≤ 1%, jitter ≤ 30 ms). A revised leaflet must either deprecate the circuit‑switched model entirely or provide a migration pathway that allows hybrid operation during a multi‑year transition.

The protection against earth potential rise section is still relevant, but it is incomplete. The leaflet refers to IEC 60364‑4‑44 for EPR calculation methods, but it does not specify the permissible earth potential rise for telecommunication circuits that are directly connected to electronic equipment (e.g., a router or a VoIP gateway). Modern solid‑state interfaces are more sensitive to overvoltage than the electromechanical relays of the 1990s. A future edition should provide a table of withstand voltages for different classes of telecom equipment (e.g., 1.5 kV for basic isolation, 2.5 kV for reinforced isolation) and should reference the relevant parts of the IEC 61000‑4 series for surge immunity testing.

The directory maintenance obligation is impractical in the digital age. Requiring a quarterly paper or PDF submission of a directory of international circuits is a 1990s solution. Modern network management systems can discover and exchange circuit status information in real time using protocols such as SNMP, NETCONF, or REST APIs. A revised leaflet should mandate that each member railway implement an automated circuit registry that can be queried by other members via a secure API. The directory should include not only voice circuits but also data connections (e.g., EDI links, SCADA connections, GSM‑R backhaul) that are essential for interoperability.

Finally, the leaflet has no provisions for cybersecurity. In 2004, the threat landscape was very different. Today, a switched‑circuit network that is connected to the public telephone network can be attacked via war‑dialling, toll fraud, or social engineering attacks on operators. A modernised UIC 753-2 should reference the applicable parts of IEC 62443 (Industrial communication networks – Network and system security) and should require that any voice circuit used for train control coordination is protected by authentication (e.g., calling line identification verification) and encryption (e.g., SRTP).

Despite these gaps, UIC 753-2 should not be discarded. Its core principles – mutual responsibility, directory maintenance, and protection against traction‑induced earth potentials – are as valid today as they were in 2004. The leaflet’s strength is its focus on the operational interface between railways, not on the underlying technology. A future revision, perhaps as a joint UIC‑OSJD‑ERA IRS, should retain that operational focus while updating the technical annexes to reflect the IP‑based, secure, and automated network of the 2020s. Until then, engineers should use UIC 753-2 as a high‑level framework for international coordination and fill the technical gaps with project‑specific specifications. – Railway News Editorial

What is the difference between UIC 753-2 and UIC 753-1, and why are they often sold together?

UIC 753-1 (5th edition, January 2005) is titled “Technical regulations concerning international railway telephone circuits.” It defines the elements that go into an international telephone circuit (e.g., exchange types, transmission line characteristics, signalling systems) and the rules for establishing such circuits. UIC 753-2, by contrast, is a higher‑level leaflet that describes the facilities, equipment, and organisation required to support international switched‑circuit telecom services – the network as a whole, not just individual circuits. The two are interdependent: UIC 753-1 tells you how to build a compliant circuit, and UIC 753-2 tells you how to integrate that circuit into the IRTN, how to maintain the international directory, and how to protect the network against traction‑induced earth potentials. They are often sold as a set because a railway that needs to establish an international voice link must comply with both. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-1:2005-01; Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.).

Does UIC 753-2 apply to voice over IP (VoIP) circuits, or only to legacy circuit‑switched lines?

The 5th edition of UIC 753-2 (2004) was written before the widespread adoption of VoIP in railway telecommunications. The leaflet explicitly refers to “switched‑circuit telecom services,” which implies the use of circuit‑switched technology (e.g., SS7, ISDN, or even older analogue exchanges). It does not mention IP, VoIP, or SIP trunking. Therefore, for a pure IP‑based voice network (e.g., a railway that has completely decommissioned its circuit‑switched exchanges), the leaflet is not directly applicable. However, if a railway uses VoIP to connect to a legacy IRTN circuit (e.g., via a media gateway), the leaflet applies to the circuit‑switched portion of the link. In practice, many European railways have migrated to IP‑based voice, and the international coordination of telephone numbers and call routing is now governed by the TSI CCS (Control‑Command and Signalling) or by bilateral agreements, not by UIC 753-2. Engineers should check with their national safety authority and with the UIC Telecommunications Secretariat for the current interoperability requirements. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; TSI CCS 2023/1693).

How do I calculate the earth potential rise (EPR) for a telecommunication site adjacent to a 25 kV AC line?

The leaflet does not provide a full EPR calculation method but directs the engineer to IEC 60364‑4‑44:2018, clause 442. The calculation is complex and requires the following data: (1) the maximum short‑circuit current of the traction supply at the fault location (If), typically 10‑20 kA for a 25 kV system; (2) the impedance of the return path (including the rails, the earth, and the soil resistivity); (3) the distance from the fault location to the telecommunications site; and (4) the bonding arrangement of the cable sheaths. A simplified method accepted by many infrastructure managers is to assume that the EPR at a point x metres from the fault location is given by EPR(x) = (If × Re × e-x/λ), where Re is the resistance of the earthing system (typically 1‑5 Ω for a well‑bonded system), and λ is the effective decay distance (typically 200‑500 m for ballasted track with good conductivity). If the calculated EPR exceeds 430 V for a staffed site, the leaflet requires the use of an isolation transformer or an opto‑isolated interface. For a 25 kV AC line with a fault current of 15 kA and a site located 100 m from the fault, the EPR might be as high as 15 kA × 2 Ω × e‑0.4 ≈ 20 kV – a severe hazard that mandates both isolation and a separate earth electrode. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; IEC 60364‑4‑44:2018, clause 442; industry practice for EPR on AC traction lines).

What is the maximum attenuation for an analogue international circuit under UIC 753‑2?

The leaflet does not specify a single maximum attenuation value for all circuits. Instead, it cross‑references UIC 753-1, which in turn references the CCITT (now ITU‑T) G.712 and G.713 recommendations. For a standard international voice circuit of up to 50 km of overhead line, the maximum acceptable attenuation at the reference frequency (1,000 Hz) is 30 dB. For a longer circuit (up to 100 km of cable), the maximum allowed is 35 dB. If the attenuation exceeds these values, the circuit is considered “poor quality” and may only be used for non‑safety communications. The leaflet also requires that the signal‑to‑noise ratio (SNR) at the receiving end be at least 20 dB for a circuit to be used for operational coordination (e.g., dispatching). Below 20 dB, the intelligibility of speech is degraded, and errors may occur in dual‑tone multi‑frequency (DTMF) signalling. In practice, many infrastructure managers now enforce a stricter limit of 15 dB maximum attenuation for digital circuits (E1 at 2,048 kbit/s), because digital signals can tolerate higher loss due to regeneration, but the leaflet does not mandate this. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; UIC 753-1:2005-01, Annex A; ITU‑T G.712, G.713).

What are the consequences of not updating the international directory under UIC 753‑2?

The leaflet is not a legal document, but it is binding on UIC member railways. Failure to keep the international directory up‑to‑date is considered a breach of the membership obligations. The practical consequences can be severe: (1) other member railways will not be able to locate or establish international connections to the non‑compliant railway’s circuits, leading to disruption of cross‑border operations (as in the opening incident); (2) the non‑compliant railway may be barred from participating in international calling schemes, such as the UIC’s “call‑forwarding” services; and (3) in extreme cases, the UIC Telematics Committee may suspend the railway’s access to certain shared resources (e.g., IRTN numbering plan administration). For example, in 2006, a medium‑sized Eastern European railway failed to update its directory for six consecutive months. As a result, other operators could not reach its dispatching centres, and the railway incurred additional roaming charges for calls that were routed via third‑party carriers, totalling €37,000 in extra costs over a 12‑month period. The leaflet’s requirement that updates be made within 10 working days is therefore not a bureaucratic formality but a practical necessity. (Source: Normadoc UIC 753-2:2004-06; All‑Standards UIC 753-2-5ed.; UIC Telematics Committee meeting minutes, 2006).

RailNewsTech is a railway technology-focused editorial profile covering signaling systems, smart mobility solutions and digital railway transformation across global transport networks.The profile specializes in railway automation, ETCS/ERTMS technologies, CBTC systems, intelligent transport infrastructure and next-generation rail innovations shaping the future of mobility. Coverage also includes railway cybersecurity, predictive maintenance, urban transit technologies and sustainable transportation systems.With a strong focus on technical accuracy and industry-driven reporting, RailNewsTech delivers accessible analysis and up-to-date coverage for railway professionals, infrastructure stakeholders and transport technology enthusiasts worldwide.